Skip to main content
Cancer Explained
Donate

NewsResearch

Stupp Trial: What the Glioblastoma Trial Found

The Stupp trial added temozolomide to radiotherapy for newly diagnosed glioblastoma. Median survival rose from 12.1 to 14.6 months, and five-year survival from 1.9% to 9.8%. What that did and did not settle.

By Cancer Explained Editorial TeamPublished Updated

Original commentary from the Cancer Explained editorial team.

Doctor in a white coat shows a tablet screen to an older man seated beside him in an office.
Reviewing Results Together — illustrative photograph, not of anyone named in this story.

Historical context: this page explains an event dated 2005. It was published as an explainer on July 12, 2026 and is not breaking news.

Please note: this page is educational only — it is not medical advice, and it does not speculate about anyone’s health beyond reliable public reporting. For questions about your own health, talk with your healthcare team.

In brief

Before 2005, the standard treatment for newly diagnosed glioblastoma was surgery followed by radiotherapy. The trial led by Roger Stupp asked whether adding the chemotherapy drug temozolomide to that radiotherapy would help people live longer. It did. The gain was modest in months and large in proportion: median survival rose from 12.1 to 14.6 months, and the share of people alive at five years rose from 1.9% to 9.8%.

Trial at a glance

FieldDetail
TrialEORTC 26981-22981 / NCIC CE.3 (the Stupp trial)
IdentifierNCT00006353
PhasePhase 3
DesignRandomized, open-label, 85 centers
Cancer typeNewly diagnosed glioblastoma
ComparatorRadiotherapy alone (60 Gy over six weeks)
Primary endpointOverall survival
Enrollment573 patients randomized

Who took part

573 adults with newly diagnosed, biopsy-confirmed glioblastoma were randomized between August 2000 and March 2002. The registry set the age limit at 18 to 70 years. Median age was 56, and 84% had already had debulking surgery to remove as much tumor as safely possible.

What the trial found

One group received radiotherapy alone: 2 Gy a day, five days a week, for six weeks, totalling 60 Gy. The other received the same radiotherapy plus temozolomide every day throughout radiotherapy, then up to six further cycles taken for five days out of every 28, at a higher daily amount worked out from body size.

At a median follow-up of 28 months, median survival was 14.6 months with radiotherapy plus temozolomide and 12.1 months with radiotherapy alone. The hazard ratio for death was 0.63 (95% CI, 0.52 to 0.75; P<0.001). Two-year survival was 26.5% versus 10.4%. Grade 3 or 4 blood-count toxicity during the combined phase affected 7% of patients.

The five-year analysis, published in 2009, showed the gap held. Survival with temozolomide was 27.2% at two years, 16.0% at three, 12.1% at four and 9.8% at five years, against 10.9%, 4.4%, 3.0% and 1.9% with radiotherapy alone. Benefit appeared across every clinical subgroup studied, including patients aged 60 to 70. Methylation of the MGMT gene promoter, assessed later in tumor tissue from 206 patients, was the strongest predictor of who benefited.

What changed in practice

This regimen became the standard. The National Cancer Institute lists temozolomide as approved for glioblastoma "with radiation therapy in patients with newly-diagnosed cancer and then alone as maintenance therapy." Almost every glioblastoma trial since has used the Stupp regimen as its control arm.

What this story cannot tell you

  • It does not tell you glioblastoma became curable. Most participants in both groups died within two years, and 89% of the temozolomide group had died by five years.
  • It does not apply directly to people over 70, who were outside the entry criteria. A separate 2017 trial in patients aged 65 and older found that adding temozolomide to a shorter three-week radiotherapy course raised median survival from 7.6 to 9.3 months (hazard ratio 0.67; 95% CI, 0.56 to 0.80).
  • It cannot tell you whether you personally will benefit. MGMT promoter methylation status predicted benefit, but it was tested retrospectively in only some tumors, and it is a probability, not a promise.
  • Treatment has moved on in ways this trial could not anticipate. A 2017 randomized trial found that adding tumor-treating fields to maintenance temozolomide raised median overall survival from 16.0 to 20.9 months (hazard ratio 0.63; 95% CI, 0.53 to 0.76), at the cost of skin irritation under the scalp arrays in 52% of users.

Questions worth asking

  • Has my tumor been tested for MGMT promoter methylation, and what did it show?
  • Given my age and how much tumor was removed, is the standard six-week course right for me?
  • What clinical trials are open for newly diagnosed glioblastoma at this centre?

Sources

This article was written from the sources below, which were checked on the source-check date shown above.

Related reading: brain tumors and brain tumor treatment.

How this article was prepared

Prepared by Cancer Explained's AI-assisted editorial system and checked against the sources listed above. This article has not been reviewed by a healthcare professional unless a named reviewer is specifically shown.

Cancer Explained is published by the National Cancer Information Foundation as a nonprofit-oriented public-interest education project. It is not a diagnostic service, does not recommend treatments, and is not for emergencies.

Found an error, a broken source link, outdated information, or wording that feels insensitive? Report it here — we log and act on material corrections.

Know someone who needs this?

Plenty of people are looking for something like this and do not know where to start. If this would help a friend or someone you love, send it on — we have written an opening line so you do not have to stare at an empty message. You can change every word of it.

Email itText itWhatsApp

Your message is written and sent in your own email or messaging app — we never see who you send it to, and nothing is added to any list.

Put the story in context

Prevention, possible warning signs, screening, and diagnosis

This story relates to Brain tumors. The information below is general: it does not reveal anything else about a public person’s health, and not every point applies to every cancer. Personal advice depends on age, symptoms, family history, exposures, and medical history.

  • Prevention and risk reduction

    Not every cancer can be prevented. Avoiding tobacco, protecting skin from ultraviolet radiation, limiting alcohol, staying active, and receiving recommended HPV or hepatitis B vaccination can lower the risk of certain cancers. A risk factor is not a prediction or a cause in one individual.

    NCI prevention information

  • Symptoms and possible early signs

    Possible signs vary and are often caused by conditions other than cancer. Changes worth discussing include a new lump, unexplained bleeding or weight loss, a persistent cough, lasting bowel or bladder changes, a changing skin spot, or symptoms that persist or worsen. Some early cancers cause no symptoms.

    NCI signs and symptoms

  • Screening and early detection

    Screening looks for certain cancers before symptoms begin. Recommended tests exist only for some cancers and depend on age and risk. Screening can have benefits and harms; it is not the same as evaluating a new symptom, and there is no single routine scan or blood test that reliably screens for every cancer.

    NCI cancer screening information

  • How cancer is diagnosed

    Diagnosis may involve a history and exam, imaging, laboratory tests, and often a biopsy. Pathology can identify the cancer type and may test biomarkers that guide treatment. Symptoms, screening results, tumor markers, or online stories alone cannot confirm cancer.

    NCI diagnosis information

Learn about this story’s cancer topic

A public story may encourage questions, but it should not be used to estimate your risk or choose testing. Contact a healthcare professional about a persistent or concerning change. Seek urgent care for severe or rapidly worsening symptoms.

Go deeper with NCI