Skip to main content
Cancer Explained
Donate

NewsResearch

The U.S. Surgeon General's report on smoking and health

A dated cancer milestone (1964): a turning point in public understanding of tobacco harm. Why it mattered, its limits, and how the field evolved.

By Cancer Explained Editorial TeamPublished Updated

Original commentary from the Cancer Explained editorial team.

A woman presses a beige nicotine patch onto her bare upper arm
Applying the Patch — illustrative photograph, not of anyone named in this story.

Historical context: this page explains an event dated 1964. It was published as an explainer on July 12, 2026 and is not breaking news.

Please note: this page is educational only — it is not medical advice, and it does not speculate about anyone’s health beyond reliable public reporting. For questions about your own health, talk with your healthcare team.

Historical milestone — this page describes an event dated 1964. It is not current breaking news.

How the committee was assembled

The evidence had been building for thirty years. Through the 1930s, 1940s and 1950s, epidemiologists used large surveys to link rising lung cancer deaths to smoking. Pathologists confirmed it in tissue. The National Library of Medicine's account is blunt about what those studies showed. Smoking, not air pollution, asbestos or radioactive material, was the chief cause of the century's rise in lung cancer.

In 1957 Surgeon General Leroy Burney had already declared a causal relationship the official position of the US Public Health Service. It did not move the country.

What moved it was a report nobody could accuse of bias. In June 1961 the American Cancer Society, the American Heart Association, the National Tuberculosis Association and the American Public Health Association wrote to President Kennedy asking for a national commission. On 7 June 1962, Surgeon General Luther Terry announced one.

The design of that committee was the clever part. Terry took nominations from the four health groups. He also took them from the FDA, the Federal Trade Commission, the American Medical Association, and the Tobacco Institute, the industry's own lobby. Ten members were chosen across medicine, surgery, pharmacology and statistics. Anyone who had taken a public stand on tobacco was ruled out.

They met at the National Library of Medicine in Bethesda from November 1962 to January 1964. With over 150 consultants, they read more than 7,000 scientific articles.

What it said

Terry released Smoking and Health: Report of the Advisory Committee to the Surgeon General on Saturday 11 January 1964. He picked a Saturday to limit the hit to the stock market and to reach the Sunday papers.

The findings were specific. The report held cigarette smoking responsible for a 70% rise in the death rate of smokers over non-smokers. It put the lung cancer risk of average smokers at nine to ten times that of non-smokers. For heavy smokers it was at least twenty times. Risk rose with the years smoked and fell after stopping.

It named smoking as the most important cause of chronic bronchitis. It pointed to links with emphysema and heart disease. It noted that smoking in pregnancy lowered average birth weight.

On one point it flinched. The committee wrote that the tobacco habit was habituation rather than addiction. The addictive properties of nicotine were not yet established. That call took decades to correct.

Terry recalled later that the report "hit the country like a bombshell."

What the evidence says now

NCI's current position is far broader than lung cancer. Smoking causes cancer of the lung, esophagus, larynx, mouth, throat, kidney, bladder, liver, pancreas, stomach, cervix, colon and rectum. It also causes acute myeloid leukemia.

Tobacco smoke contains more than 7,000 chemicals, of which at least 250 are known to be harmful, including hydrogen cyanide, carbon monoxide and ammonia.

Cigarette smoking and exposure to tobacco smoke cause about 480,000 early deaths a year in the United States. About 36% of those are from cancer. About 39% are from heart disease and stroke, and 24% from lung disease. Death rates among smokers are roughly three times those of people who never smoked.

What stopping is worth

NCI puts numbers on this too, drawn from the US National Health Interview Survey. People who quit between ages 25 and 34 live about 10 years longer than those who keep smoking. Quitting between 35 and 44 gains about 9 years. Between 45 and 54, about 6 years. Between 55 and 64, about 4 years.

People who quit at 45 to 54 cut their chance of early death by about two-thirds. One study followed people aged 70 and over. Even smokers who stopped in their sixties had a lower risk of death than those who kept going. Our guide to quitting smoking covers the methods with evidence behind them.

Lung cancer today

SEER publishes the American Cancer Society's projection of 229,410 new US lung and bronchus cancer diagnoses and 124,990 deaths in 2026. SEER's own five-year relative survival across all stages, for 2016 to 2022, is 29.5%.

By stage, in that same span, it is 65.5% for localized disease, 38.2% for regional disease and 10.5% for distant disease. Only 24% of cases are found while still localized; 51% are already distant. These are group figures over past years and describe no individual. Our page on lung cancer covers types and treatment.

When to get checked

Screening with low-dose CT is offered to a defined high-risk group. Symptoms are separate, and worth an appointment when they persist:

  • A cough lasting more than three weeks, or a change in a long-standing cough
  • Coughing up blood, even once
  • Breathlessness that is new or getting worse
  • Chest or shoulder pain that does not settle
  • Repeated chest infections
  • Unexplained weight loss, hoarseness, or persistent fatigue

Our guide to lung cancer screening sets out who qualifies for a scan.

What this does not mean

  • The 1964 report described risks in the smokers of that era, with the cigarettes of that era.
  • The committee's judgment that nicotine was habituation rather than addiction was wrong, and it was later reversed by the Surgeon General's office.
  • A twenty-fold relative risk is not a twenty-in-twenty chance. Most heavy smokers do not develop lung cancer, and some non-smokers do.
  • The gains from quitting are averages. They do not predict any one person's outcome. They are not a reason to put off stopping at any age.
  • Smoking causes far more than lung cancer. Judging tobacco risk by lung cancer alone understates it substantially.

Sources

How this article was prepared

An AI-assisted editorial system helped prepare this page. No named medical reviewer has reviewed it unless one is listed.

The National Cancer Information Foundation publishes Cancer Explained. This page is for learning. It is not medical advice and does not suggest a test or treatment.

See an error, old source, or unclear wording? Tell us.

Know someone who needs this?

Plenty of people are looking for something like this and do not know where to start. If this would help a friend or someone you love, send it on — we have written an opening line so you do not have to stare at an empty message. You can change every word of it.

Email itText itWhatsApp

Your message is written and sent in your own email or messaging app — we never see who you send it to, and nothing is added to any list.

Put the story in context

Prevention, possible warning signs, screening, and diagnosis

This story relates to Lung cancer. The information below is general: it does not reveal anything else about a public person’s health, and not every point applies to every cancer. Personal advice depends on age, symptoms, family history, exposures, and medical history.

  • Prevention and risk reduction

    Not every cancer can be prevented. Avoiding tobacco, protecting skin from ultraviolet radiation, limiting alcohol, staying active, and receiving recommended HPV or hepatitis B vaccination can lower the risk of certain cancers. A risk factor is not a prediction or a cause in one individual.

    NCI prevention information

  • Symptoms and possible early signs

    Possible signs vary and are often caused by conditions other than cancer. Changes worth discussing include a new lump, unexplained bleeding or weight loss, a persistent cough, lasting bowel or bladder changes, a changing skin spot, or symptoms that persist or worsen. Some early cancers cause no symptoms.

    NCI signs and symptoms

  • Screening and early detection

    Screening looks for certain cancers before symptoms begin. Recommended tests exist only for some cancers and depend on age and risk. Screening can have benefits and harms; it is not the same as evaluating a new symptom, and there is no single routine scan or blood test that reliably screens for every cancer.

    NCI cancer screening information

  • How cancer is diagnosed

    Diagnosis may involve a history and exam, imaging, laboratory tests, and often a biopsy. Pathology can identify the cancer type and may test biomarkers that guide treatment. Symptoms, screening results, tumor markers, or online stories alone cannot confirm cancer.

    NCI diagnosis information

Learn about this story’s cancer topic

A public story may encourage questions, but it should not be used to estimate your risk or choose testing. Contact a healthcare professional about a persistent or concerning change. Seek urgent care for severe or rapidly worsening symptoms.

Go deeper with NCI