NewsIn memory
Edward R. Murrow: Understanding Lung Cancer
Murrow reported on the smoking and lung cancer link, then lost a lung to the disease in 1963. What lung cancer is, and who is screened for it today.
Original commentary from the Cancer Explained editorial team.
Historical context: this page explains an event dated 1965. It was published as an explainer on July 12, 2026 and is not breaking news.
Please note: this page is educational only — it is not medical advice, and it does not speculate about anyone’s health beyond reliable public reporting. For questions about your own health, talk with your healthcare team.
The reporter who covered the story that caught him
Edward R. Murrow was a pioneer of broadcast news. He reported from London during the Blitz and aired a 1954 See It Now report on Senator Joseph McCarthy.
One of the subjects his See It Now team covered was the link between smoking and lung cancer. He was, by the account of the college that carries his name at Washington State University, a lifelong chain smoker, estimated at 60 to 65 cigarettes a day.
In October 1963 his left lung was removed because of cancer. He left his post as director of the United States Information Agency, retired to his farm in Pawling, New York, and died there on April 27, 1965, two days after his 57th birthday. North Carolina's state history office, which put up a marker at his birthplace, records the cause plainly: he died of lung cancer.
What the sources establish
Two things, and they are enough. Murrow had cancer that cost him a lung in 1963, and lung cancer is recorded as what killed him in 1965.
No source we checked gives the type of lung cancer, its stage, or the treatment he had after surgery. We do not supply them here.
What lung cancer is
Lung cancer starts in the tissue of the lungs. The National Cancer Institute divides it into two main groups.
Non-small cell lung cancer is the more common one. Surgery is an option for some early-stage cases.
Small cell lung cancer is less common.
Smoking causes most lung cancer. It is not the only cause. People who never smoked develop it too, from radon gas in buildings, from workplace exposures such as asbestos, from air pollution, and sometimes from nothing anyone can name.
Taking out a lung, then and now
Removing an entire lung is called a pneumonectomy. It is a large thing to live without.
Surgery today can be smaller. When a tumor is caught early, surgeons often remove only the affected lobe, or a smaller wedge of tissue. The aim is the same tumor control with more breathing left over.
Drug treatment has changed even more. Some tumors carry specific gene changes that a targeted drug can act on. Others respond to immunotherapy, which helps the immune system recognize the cancer. Neither existed in 1963, and both start with a biopsy that names what the tumor is.
Who gets screened
Lung cancer can be quiet until it is advanced, which is why screening matters.
The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommends a yearly low-dose CT scan for adults aged 50 to 80 who have a 20 pack-year smoking history and who still smoke or quit within the past 15 years. A pack-year is a pack a day for a year. Screening stops after 15 years without smoking, or when other health problems mean surgery would not be possible.
Screening is not free of harm. Scans find spots that turn out to be nothing, and chasing them means more tests. That is why the decision belongs in a conversation with a clinician rather than in a rule of thumb.
What quitting still does
Quitting lowers the risk of lung cancer, including for people who have smoked for decades. It does not return the risk to that of a never-smoker, and it is one of the most useful things a smoker can do for these odds.
What this does not mean
- A heavy smoking history does not make lung cancer certain, and never smoking does not rule it out.
- Murrow's course in the 1960s says nothing about outcomes now. The tests and drugs are different.
- Being eligible for screening is not a diagnosis. Many scans find nothing serious.
- Nothing here is medical advice or a reason to change your own care.
Sources
- Edward R. Murrow College of Communication, Washington State University: About Edward R. Murrow
- North Carolina Department of Natural and Cultural Resources: Edward R. Murrow 1908-1965 (J-92)
- National Cancer Institute: Lung Cancer—Patient Version
- U.S. Preventive Services Task Force: Lung Cancer Screening
How this page was made
An AI-assisted editorial system helped prepare this page. This article has not been reviewed by a healthcare professional unless a named reviewer is specifically shown. Cancer Explained is published by the National Cancer Information Foundation as a nonprofit-oriented public-interest education project. It is not a diagnostic service, does not recommend treatments, and is not for emergencies.
See an error, old source, or unclear wording? Tell us.
Put the story in context
Prevention, possible warning signs, screening, and diagnosis
This story relates to Lung cancer. The information below is general: it does not reveal anything else about a public person’s health, and not every point applies to every cancer. Personal advice depends on age, symptoms, family history, exposures, and medical history.
Prevention and risk reduction
Not every cancer can be prevented. Avoiding tobacco, protecting skin from ultraviolet radiation, limiting alcohol, staying active, and receiving recommended HPV or hepatitis B vaccination can lower the risk of certain cancers. A risk factor is not a prediction or a cause in one individual.
Symptoms and possible early signs
Possible signs vary and are often caused by conditions other than cancer. Changes worth discussing include a new lump, unexplained bleeding or weight loss, a persistent cough, lasting bowel or bladder changes, a changing skin spot, or symptoms that persist or worsen. Some early cancers cause no symptoms.
Screening and early detection
Screening looks for certain cancers before symptoms begin. Recommended tests exist only for some cancers and depend on age and risk. Screening can have benefits and harms; it is not the same as evaluating a new symptom, and there is no single routine scan or blood test that reliably screens for every cancer.
How cancer is diagnosed
Diagnosis may involve a history and exam, imaging, laboratory tests, and often a biopsy. Pathology can identify the cancer type and may test biomarkers that guide treatment. Symptoms, screening results, tumor markers, or online stories alone cannot confirm cancer.
Learn more about lung cancer
A public story may encourage questions, but it should not be used to estimate your risk or choose testing. Contact a healthcare professional about a persistent or concerning change. Seek urgent care for severe or rapidly worsening symptoms.