Skip to main content
Cancer Explained
Donate
Beginner 8 min readSource checked

Metastatic Stomach Cancer: What to Ask

The four biomarker results that decide first-line treatment in metastatic stomach cancer, what each branch looks like, and the second- and third-line options after it.

This is general education — it cannot tell you what to do in your situation.

Instructions and urgent-contact thresholds vary by treatment and care team. If you are in treatment, follow the instructions your oncology team gave you, and contact them about any new or worsening symptom. If you think you may be having a medical emergency, call your local emergency number.

NCI source

NCI PDQ — Gastric Cancer Treatment (Health Professional Version)

A female doctor talks with an older man, hand on his shoulder, in an office setting
A female doctor talks with an older man, hand on his shoulder, in an office setting

Key fact

NCI states that people with metastatic gastric adenocarcinoma should consider testing for HER2 amplification, mismatch repair or microsatellite instability status, and PD-L1 combined positive score.

The short answer

In metastatic gastric adenocarcinoma, NCI advises testing for HER2 amplification, mismatch repair status or microsatellite instability, and PD-L1 combined positive score. Claudin 18.2 adds a fourth branch. Those results, not the stage alone, decide which first-line regimen applies, and the differences between branches are large.

  • NCI states that people with metastatic gastric adenocarcinoma should consider testing for HER2 amplification, mismatch repair or microsatellite instability status, and PD-L1 combined positive score.

  • HER2-positive is defined as 3+ by immunohistochemistry, or 2+ with a positive FISH result. In the ToGA trial only 22% of 3,665 tumors tested positive.

  • For HER2-negative disease, CheckMate-649 found median overall survival of 14.0 months with nivolumab plus chemotherapy versus 11.3 months with chemotherapy alone.

  • For claudin 18.2-positive, HER2-negative disease, adding zolbetuximab to CAPOX raised median overall survival from 12.16 to 14.39 months in the GLOW trial.

Choose how you want to understand this

The full explanation.

Four test results decide the first move

Stage IV is not the branching point here. The tumor's biology is.

NCI says people with metastatic gastric adenocarcinoma should consider testing for three things. HER2 amplification. Defective mismatch repair, or microsatellite instability. And PD-L1 combined positive score. A fourth, claudin 18.2, has since joined them.

Those four results split the disease into different treatment paths. Two people with identical scans can be offered different drugs on this basis alone. So the first practical question is not what stage this is. It is whether all four tests have been run and reported.

If HER2 is negative

Most gastric cancers are. The backbone here is chemotherapy, usually fluorouracil or capecitabine with oxaliplatin.

The change of the last few years was adding a checkpoint drug. CheckMate-649 randomized 1,581 people. One arm got nivolumab with chemotherapy. That meant nivolumab with CAPOX every 3 weeks, or with FOLFOX every 2 weeks, at the amount matched to each schedule. The other got chemotherapy alone.

Median overall survival was 14.0 months with nivolumab added. It was 11.3 months without. In the subgroup with PD-L1 CPS of 5 or more, the figures were 14.4 and 11.1 months.

That is why the CPS number matters. It does not switch the drug off. It changes the size of the expected gain.

If HER2 is positive

The definition is precise. HER2-positive means 3+ staining on immunohistochemistry, or 2+ with a positive FISH test.

It is also uncommon. In the ToGA trial, 3,665 tumors were tested and 810 were positive. That is about 22%.

ToGA established the drug. Median overall survival was 13.8 months with trastuzumab added to cisplatin plus fluorouracil or capecitabine. It was 11.1 months with chemotherapy alone. Cardiac toxicity was rare in both arms.

KEYNOTE-811 added a checkpoint drug on top. It randomized 434 people to chemotherapy and trastuzumab every 3 weeks, with or without pembrolizumab on the same schedule. At the first interim analysis, the objective response rate was 74.4% with pembrolizumab and 51.9% without. Grade 3 or higher events ran at about 57% in both arms, though a third of those in the pembrolizumab arm were immune-related.

For people who cannot tolerate pembrolizumab, NCI notes trastuzumab may be combined with cisplatin and fluorouracil or capecitabine.

The claudin 18.2 branch

Claudin 18.2 is a protein in the tight junctions between stomach lining cells. Some cancers keep it. Zolbetuximab targets it.

Two phase III trials tested adding it to chemotherapy in claudin 18.2-positive, HER2-negative disease. GLOW randomized 507 people to CAPOX with zolbetuximab or placebo. Median progression-free survival was 8.21 months against 6.80. Median overall survival was 14.39 months against 12.16.

SPOTLIGHT randomized 565 people to mFOLFOX6 with zolbetuximab or placebo. Median progression-free survival was 10.61 months against 8.67, with a reduced risk of death. A combined analysis of both trials found no harm to quality of life.

The gains are measured in weeks to months. They are also real, randomized, and only available to people whose tumor was tested.

After the first line

NCI is blunt here. There is no standard treatment option after progression on first-line palliative chemotherapy.

What exists is a list of accepted regimens. Paclitaxel with or without ramucirumab. Docetaxel. Irinotecan, with or without fluorouracil and leucovorin.

The ramucirumab data are specific. In RAINBOW, 665 people got paclitaxel on days 1, 8 and 15 of a 28-day cycle, plus ramucirumab or placebo on days 1 and 15. Median overall survival was 9.6 months against 7.4. Ramucirumab alone, in REGARD, gave 5.2 months against 3.8.

Two biomarker-driven options sit alongside. Pembrolizumab is approved for dMMR or MSI-high tumors. Trastuzumab deruxtecan is approved for HER2-positive disease after a trastuzumab-based regimen. In DESTINY-Gastric01, given by vein every 3 weeks, the objective response rate was 51% against 14% for chemotherapy, and overall survival was 12.5 against 8.4 months. Its toxicity list is worth reading before starting: grade 3 to 4 neutropenia in 51%, grade 3 to 4 anemia in 38%, and drug-related interstitial lung disease in 10%.

Third line has one FDA-approved option. In TAGS, trifluridine and tipiracil tablets taken twice daily on days 1 to 5 and 8 to 12 of each 28-day cycle — at a strength your oncologist calculates from your body size — gave median overall survival of 5.7 months against 3.6 for placebo.

Two results worth knowing about pembrolizumab

Checkpoint drugs are not interchangeable here, and the record includes negatives.

KEYNOTE-062 randomized 763 people with untreated advanced gastric cancer and a PD-L1 CPS of 1 or more. It compared pembrolizumab alone, pembrolizumab with chemotherapy, and chemotherapy alone. The final results showed no superiority for either pembrolizumab arm over chemotherapy alone. In the subgroup with CPS of 10 or more, median overall survival was 17.4 months with pembrolizumab alone against 10.8 months with chemotherapy. NCI notes the statistical plan did not test that difference further, so it is a signal rather than a conclusion.

There is also an approval that was taken back. Pembrolizumab had been approved as third-line treatment for gastric and gastroesophageal junction cancers with a CPS of 1 or more. NCI records that this approval was withdrawn after first-line therapy changed to combined chemotherapy and PD-1 blockade.

The symptoms that need their own plan

Systemic drugs do not fix a mechanical problem, and stomach cancer creates mechanical problems.

NCI lists the tools directly. For gastric obstruction, endoluminal laser therapy, an endoluminal stent, or a gastrojejunostomy may help. Palliative radiation therapy may relieve bleeding, pain, and obstruction. Palliative resection is reserved for continued bleeding or obstruction.

These run in parallel with drug treatment, not after it. Raising an eating or bleeding problem early keeps that option open. More on this track is in palliative care.

What to bring to the first appointment

The most useful item is the pathology report itself, with all four biomarker results on it. Second is a weight history, because nutrition drives what treatment is tolerable. Third is a list of everything currently taken.

For background, see stomach cancer and biomarker testing and precision medicine.

When to get help sooner

  • Call 911 or go to an emergency department if you vomit blood or something that looks like coffee grounds, pass black tarry stools, or feel faint and clammy with either. Bleeding is one of the two problems NCI names palliative resection for, and it can be brisk.
  • Call your care team immediately, at any hour, if your temperature reaches 100.4°F (38°C) or higher while you are on chemotherapy. CDC treats a fever during chemotherapy as a medical emergency, because the drugs leave too few white cells to contain an infection, and hours matter. If you cannot get through fast, head to an emergency department and tell them you are having chemotherapy.
  • Call your care team the same day if you cannot keep fluids down, food comes back up soon after eating, or your belly is swollen and you have stopped passing gas. Those point to the obstruction that a stent, laser or gastrojejunostomy is meant to relieve. Call the same day too for a new dry cough or breathlessness if you are on trastuzumab deruxtecan, because lung inflammation occurred in about 1 in 10 people on that drug.
  • Call your care team within a day or two if swallowing is getting harder, you are eating less each week, or weight is falling. Nutrition decides what treatment you can tolerate, so this is worth raising before the next scheduled visit.

Sources

Words to know

Tap any term to see what it means.

Browse the full glossary →

A woman in headscarf and man talk with a female professional at a desk

Common questions

Which tests should be done before first-line treatment?

NCI names HER2 amplification, defective mismatch repair by immunohistochemistry or microsatellite instability by PCR, and PD-L1 combined positive score. Claudin 18.2 status matters as well for HER2-negative tumors, because it determines whether zolbetuximab applies.

What counts as HER2-positive in stomach cancer?

Either 3+ staining on immunohistochemistry, or 2+ staining with a positive fluorescence in situ hybridization result. In the ToGA trial, 810 of 3,665 tumors tested were positive, about 22%.

Is there a standard second-line treatment?

NCI states there is no standard treatment option after progression on first-line palliative chemotherapy. Accepted regimens include paclitaxel with or without ramucirumab, docetaxel, and irinotecan with or without fluorouracil and leucovorin. Pembrolizumab applies to dMMR or MSI-high tumors, and trastuzumab deruxtecan to HER2-positive tumors after a trastuzumab-based regimen.

Questions to ask your doctor

Being prepared helps you get the most out of your appointments. Save or print these questions.

Open my question list

Tap a question to save it to your list (kept on this device).

Your next step

Turn this topic into questions for your next appointment.

Build a question list
Human Connection Layer

Speak With Trained Specialists & Human Navigators

Cancer Explained provides educational guidance, but does not replace trained specialists, social workers, or your medical team.

Free & Confidential

Talk to a trained cancer information specialist

Free, confidential assistance from NCI Cancer Information Service via phone, chat, or email.

Contact your oncology team

Locate after-hours contact numbers, portal messages, or urgent triage phone lines.

Find a patient navigator

Get one-on-one help with appointments, logistics, translation, and care coordination.

Find a genetic counselor

Discuss inherited mutation risk, family history, and genetic testing options.

Find an oncology social worker

Access emotional counseling, family support groups, and mental health resources.

Find a financial navigator

Locate copay assistance foundations, grant programs, and lodging/travel support.

Find a clinical-trial specialist

Search matching studies and speak with NCI trial information specialists.

Get urgent help

Immediate emergency guidance for fever (>100.4°F during chemo), severe pain, or shortness of breath.

Help Us Improve This Guide

Did this explanation answer your question and help you determine your next step?

Know someone who needs this?

Plenty of people are looking for something like this and do not know where to start. If this would help a friend or someone you love, send it on — we have written an opening line so you do not have to stare at an empty message. You can change every word of it.

Email itText itWhatsApp

Your message is written and sent in your own email or messaging app — we never see who you send it to, and nothing is added to any list.

Plain-language explanation of the published sources cited on this page. AI-assisted, source-checked, not clinician-reviewed.

Sources last checked: 2026-08-13 what this meansLast updated: 2026-08-19Next planned review: 2027-07-30

How this page was created

Cancer Explained does not originate medical claims. Every page restates guidance already published by the National Cancer Institute, the CDC, the USPSTF and the FDA, in plain language, with the source cited so you can check the original yourself. AI does the translating and organizing; automated checks test claims, citations, clarity and safety before anything publishes. We do not employ clinicians and do not intend to — our work is translation and navigation, not clinical judgment. Nothing here is personal medical advice, and no page can account for your particular situation.

Editorial status — Source checked. This page was written with AI assistance and checked line by line against the sources listed on it. That confirms the sources support what the page says. It is not a medical review, and it does not confirm the page is complete or right for your situation.

High-risk topic — talk to your care team. This topic can involve urgent, individual medical decisions. This page is general education only: it cannot tell you whether your situation is an emergency or what you personally should do. Follow your oncology team's instructions and contact them for individual guidance.

Human medical review: not completed. Pages here are not signed off by a clinician before they publish. That is not an oversight we are quietly working around: we restate published guidance and cite it, so the authority belongs to the source rather than to us, and every page names where its claims come from — you can verify us instead of trusting us. Where a volunteer clinician has reviewed a page, their name and credentials appear on it; where no name appears, no clinician has checked it. We are glad to have reviewers and are recruiting them, and we do not hold pages back waiting for one. Use this site to understand your situation and to ask better questions of the people treating you.

Our editorial processHow we use AIReport an error

How this page was created

Cancer Explained does not originate medical claims. Every page restates guidance already published by the National Cancer Institute, the CDC, the USPSTF and the FDA, in plain language, with the source cited so you can check the original yourself. AI does the translating and organizing; automated checks test claims, citations, clarity and safety before anything publishes. We do not employ clinicians and do not intend to — our work is translation and navigation, not clinical judgment. Nothing here is personal medical advice, and no page can account for your particular situation.

Editorial status: Source checked This page was written with AI assistance and checked line by line against the sources listed on it. That confirms the sources support what the page says. It is not a medical review, and it does not confirm the page is complete or right for your situation.

Human medical review: not completed. Pages here are not signed off by a clinician before they publish. That is not an oversight we are quietly working around: we restate published guidance and cite it, so the authority belongs to the source rather than to us, and every page names where its claims come from — you can verify us instead of trusting us. Where a volunteer clinician has reviewed a page, their name and credentials appear on it; where no name appears, no clinician has checked it. We are glad to have reviewers and are recruiting them, and we do not hold pages back waiting for one. Use this site to understand your situation and to ask better questions of the people treating you.

Read more about our editorial process, our use of AI, and our corrections policy.

Spotted a problem? Report an error — a factual mistake, broken or outdated source, confusing wording, or anything that seems unsafe. Please do not include names, medical record numbers, dates of birth, addresses, or other identifying medical information in your report.

After using this page, do you understand what to do next?

Anonymous — we only record the answer, never who gave it.